On the Measure of Intelligence by François Chollet - Part 1: Foundations (Paper Explained)

How does one measure the Intelligence of an AI? Is AlphaGo intelligent? How about GPT-3? In this landmark paper, Chollet proposes a solid measure of intelligence for AI that revolves around generalization, rather than skill. OUTLINE: 0:00 - Intro 1:15 - The need for a measure of intelligence 3:35 - Intelligence as generalization ability 5:45 - Nature vs nurture 11:45 - Skill-based evaluation 18:30 - Generalization based evaluation 30:25 - Inspiration from psychometrics 36:30 - Conclusion https://ift.tt/2CfFoxr Abstract: To make deliberate progress towards more intelligent and more human-like artificial systems, we need to be following an appropriate feedback signal: we need to be able to define and evaluate intelligence in a way that enables comparisons between two systems, as well as comparisons with humans. Over the past hundred years, there has been an abundance of attempts to define and measure intelligence, across both the fields of psychology and AI. We summarize and critically assess these definitions and evaluation approaches, while making apparent the two historical conceptions of intelligence that have implicitly guided them. We note that in practice, the contemporary AI community still gravitates towards benchmarking intelligence by comparing the skill exhibited by AIs and humans at specific tasks such as board games and video games. We argue that solely measuring skill at any given task falls short of measuring intelligence, because skill is heavily modulated by prior knowledge and experience: unlimited priors or unlimited training data allow experimenters to "buy" arbitrary levels of skills for a system, in a way that masks the system's own generalization power. We then articulate a new formal definition of intelligence based on Algorithmic Information Theory, describing intelligence as skill-acquisition efficiency and highlighting the concepts of scope, generalization difficulty, priors, and experience. Using this definition, we propose a set of guidelines for what a general AI benchmark should look like. Finally, we present a benchmark closely following these guidelines, the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC), built upon an explicit set of priors designed to be as close as possible to innate human priors. We argue that ARC can be used to measure a human-like form of general fluid intelligence and that it enables fair general intelligence comparisons between AI systems and humans. Authors: François Chollet Thumbnail: Photo by mohamed hassan Links: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/yannickilcher Twitter: https://twitter.com/ykilcher BitChute: https://ift.tt/38iX6OV Minds: https://ift.tt/37igBpB